ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the changes in serum procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with severe pneumonia, and to analyze its value on evaluating the clinical outcome of patients with severe pneumonia. Methods A total of 58 patients with severe pneumonia aged over 18 years, and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Zhuozhou City Hospital of Hebei Province from January 2017 to July 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into recovery group (the symptoms and signs of pneumonia disappeared or improved, and the X-ray chest films improved or did not make significant progress) and deterioration group (the symptoms and signs of pneumonia persisted or progressed, while X-ray chest radiography progressed, as well as serious complications such as involvement of other organ functions due to deterioration of pulmonary infection or septic shock) according to the therapeutic outcome. The serum PCT levels at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 days after severe pneumonia diagnosed were recorded, and procalcitonin clearance rate (PCTc) was calculated. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score was estimated within 24 hours when severe pneumonia was diagnosed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to analyze the value of PCTc on evaluating the clinical outcome of patients with severe pneumonia. Results Among 58 patients, 33 (56.9%) had better outcome after active treatment (recovery group), and 25 (44.1%) had worse condition (deterioration group). There was no significant difference in PCT level at 1 day or 3 days between the recovery group and the deterioration group [μg/L: 5.05 (3.89, 7.61) vs. 5.29 (4.15, 7.46) at 1 day, 4.59 (4.02, 6.90) vs. 5.70 (4.59, 7.28) at 3 days, both P > 0.05]. With the prolongation of treatment time, serum PCT level was gradually decreased in the recovery group, while remained at higher level in the deterioration group, which was significantly lowered at 5, 7, 9 days in the recovery group as compared with that in the deterioration group [μg/L:2.92 (2.09, 3.42) vs. 6.09 (3.24, 7.96) at 5 days, 1.94 (1.50, 2.07) vs. 7.65 (5.60, 10.52) at 7 days, 1.37 (0.91, 1.74) vs. 8.96 (6.09, 10.87) at 9 days, all P < 0.01]. PCTc at 3, 5, 7, 9 days in the recovery group were significantly higher than those in the deterioration group [15.10 (-17.80, 32.10)% vs. -1.53 (-20.80, 11.48)% at 3 days, 47.50 (30.25, 60.34)% vs. 6.25 (-14.58, 29.05)% at 5 days, 76.44 (53.18, 77.92)% vs. -11.20 (-66.75, -1.38)% at 7 days, 80.01 (59.86, 88.27)% vs. -38.15 (-99.38, -2.81)% at 9 days, all P < 0.05]. ROC curve analysis showed that PCTc at 3, 5, 7 and 9 days were valuable for evaluating the clinical outcome of patients with severe pneumonia, and 9-day PCTc had the greatest value, the AUC was 0.978 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.945-1.000, P = 0.000], which was higher than APACHEⅡ(AUC = 0.442, 95%CI = 0.280-0.610, P = 0.392); when the best cut-off value of 9-day PCTc was 93.00%, its sensitivity was 99.0%, and specificity was 87.3%. Conclusions The PCT level of patients with severe pneumonia remained at a high level, which was related with the deterioration of the disease. PCTc, as an index to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with severe pneumonia, has good application value.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the blood specimen collection site,inspection time and hemolysis influ-ence on biochemical test results.Methods The specimens of 2586 cases outpatients and hospitalized patients in our hospital who accepted blood routine and blood coagulation four check were analyzed.The hemolysis and qualified specimens of biochemical test results were compared.Results 2 586 specimens found unqualified blood samples in 18 cases,and the incidence rate was 0.70% (18 /2 586).Samples of different section and source were compared and found there were no significant difference (F =0.36,P >0.05).In 18 cases of unqualified blood samples due to technical problems and unqualified sample accounted for 88.89% (16 /18).The technical factors that lead to unqualified samples was significantly higher than that of the instrument factor or fixed factors,and the difference was statistically significant(χ2 =152.63,98.52,all P <0.05).In addition,hemolysis caused the most of the unqualified samples for the technical factors.To choose potassium infusion on the side ipsilateral to the site or from the opposite side of the site collected blood samples.Sodium,chlorine,creatinine,uric acid,glucose detection found in effect of blood on the same side of the infusion of the biochemical test results in varying degrees.Potassium,chlorine,sodium, creatinine decreased significantly,and uric acid,glucose and other indicators were significantly increased (t =4.51, 4.98,5.50,3.25,10.18,15.25,all P <0.05).Gamma transpeptidase,creatine kinase,sodium and uric acid and other index of hemolytic samples were significantly lower than those of normal samples,and alanine aminotransferase (ALT),direct bilirubin,potassium,phosphorus,serum creatinine and creatine kinase were significantly higher than those of the normal samples (t =14.85,21.21,7.15,4.86,10.33,4.02,3.11,8.20,7.54,5.11,all P <0.05).This may cause the depth in erythrocytes and some related substances.The time of collecting blood to sent to the room had obvious influence on the biochemical test results,alanine aminotransferase,aspartate amino transferase,glucose, creatine kinase and hydroxybutyrate and project them 1 h after submission were significantly lower than those of the standard inspection,and 1 hour after the submission of lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase isoenzyme index were significantly higher than those of the standardize inspection means (t =2.95,4.82,2.88,5.44,4.05,3.98, 4.89,all P <0.05).Conclusion Sampling sites,hemolysis and inspection time had effect on blood specimen,so for the collection of blood samples must be strictly in accordance with the requirements of the operation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of Shenqi Fuzheng injection for treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).Methods A prospective clinical study was conducted. Fifty-eight consecutive patients with AECOPD were admitted in Departments of Respiratory Disease and Critical Care Medicine in Zhuozhou City Hospital of Hebei Province from January 2012 to December 2013. They were randomly divided into western medicine (WM) control group (28 cases, the routine treatment of WM) and integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with WM group (30 cases, on the basis of conventional therapy, Shenqi Fuzheng injection 250 mL intravenous drip was given once a day for a therapeutic course of 10 days). The duration of mechanical ventilation, the successful rate of weaning from ventilator, the rate of using ventilator again after weaning, the length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were recorded respectively in the two groups. Before and after treatment, the arterial blood gas analysis, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), pulmonary function and dyspnea score were evaluated. Results Compared with the WM control group, the duration of mechanical ventilation (hours: 104±16 vs. 125±24) and the length of stay in ICU (days: 6.3±2.1 vs. 7.2±3.6) were significantly shorter, the rate of successful weaning from ventilator was obviously higher [73.3% (22/30) vs. 60.7% (17/28)], and the rate of using ventilator again after weaning was remarkably lower [13.3% (4/30) vs. 28.6% (8/28)] in the combined TCM and WM group, the differences between the two groups being statistically significant (allP 0.05). Compared with those before treatment, the pH value, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity(FVC) and the ratio of FEV1/FVC were all significantly higher in the two groups after treatment, while the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), APACHE Ⅱ score, CPIS score, residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC), and the dyspnea score were all lower in the two groups after treatment, the more obvious changes in levels being after 10 days of treatment in combined TCM and WM group [pH: 7.44±0.04 vs. 7.40±0.08, PaCO2 (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 59.1±11.9 vs. 68.1±12.4, PaO2 (mmHg): 70.5±6.9 vs. 65.1±7.4, APACHE Ⅱ score: 14.5±4.2 vs. 17.4±2.2, CPIS score: 5.3±2.4 vs. 7.6±1.4, FEV1 (L): 1.60±0.47 vs. 1.54±0.34, FEV1/FVC: (65.33±2.65)% vs. (62.00±3.25)%, FVC (L): 1.72±0.21 vs. 1.66±0.21, RV/TLC: (42.13±1.67)% vs. (43.12±0.95)%, dyspnea scores: 1.71±0.54 vs. 2.32±0.65, allP < 0.05].Conclusion Shenqi Fuzheng injection possesses certain clinical value in treatment of patients with AECOPD, as it can obviously improve the pulmonary function and the data of arterial blood gas analyses, and effectively relieve the clinical symptoms.